OZ 2003/2

M T 75 ORGANIZACIJA ZNANJA 2003, LETN. 8, ZV. 2 strukturiranje obstajajo formalne in postopkovno določene metode. Vsako od teh metod lahko upora- bimo v relacijski, v funkcijski in še kakšni domeni. Pri načrtovanju baz podatkov se npr. postopki členjenja za odpravljanje redundance v naborih primerov imenujejo normalizacija. Dobljena shema elektronskega arhiva ni v neskladju s standardom Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS), do določene mere ga tudi verificira kot problemsko utemeljenega in primernega za zasnovo elektronskega arhiva znanstvenih in strokovnih dokumentov. Ta standard pa ni zadosten za zasnovo elek- tronskega arhiva znanstvenih in strokovnih dokumentov. Opombe 1 Metodo ohranjanja elektronskih virov z univerzalnim virtualnim ra č unalnikom (UVC) so razvili raziskovalci podjetja IBM. 2 S spremembo nabora primerov se spremeni tudi funkcija. Zaradi preglednosti pa so poimenovanja funkcij ohranjena. 3 Kvadratna funkcija je bila kot primer za prikaz postopka strukturi- ranja izbrana zaradi preprostosti in ker je možno zanjo postopek strukturiranja v okviru omejenega obsega prispevka dovolj po- drobno dokumentirati. 4 Strukturiran niz situacije ne spremeni bistveno. Vsakemu znaku strukturiranega niza, ki je namenjen prikazu, pripada pozicija za prikaz na zaslonu. Reference [1] Bailey, C. W, Jr. (2003). Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliog- raphy, Version 48: 4/18/2003. http://info.lib.uh.edu/sepb/sepb.html [2] Crow, R. (2002). SPARC Institutional Repository Checklist & Resource Guide. http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/IR_Guide.html [3] Crow, R. (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/IR_Final_Release_102.pdf [4] Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI). http://dublincore.org/ [5] Guédon, J.-C. (2001). In Oldenburg’s Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing, ISBN 0-198006-81-30, ARL Proceedings 138. http://www.arl.org/arl/proceedings/138/guedon.html [6] Harnad, S. (2001). For Whom the Gate Tolls? How and Why to Free the Refereed Research Literature Online Through Author/ Institution Self-Archiving, Now. http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/resolution.htm [7] Herzog, E., Törne, A. Support for Representation of Functional Behaviour Specifications in AP-233. http://syseng.omg.org/Papers/HerzogTorne_Repr of Functional Behaviior.pdf [8] IDEF Family of Methods, (2000). http://www.idef.com/default.html [9] Lorie, R. (2002). The UVC: a Method for Preserving Digital Documents – Proof of Concept, ISBN: 90-6259-157-4. http://www.kb.nl/kb/ict/dea/ltp/reports/4-uvc.pdf [10] Lynch, C. A. (2001). Metadata Harvesting and the Open Archives Initiative, ARL Bimonthly Report, Issue 217. http://www.arl.org/newsltr/217/mhp.html [11] Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard (METS). http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/ [12] The NINCH Guide to Good Practice in the Digital Representation and Management of Cultural Heritage Materials (2002). http://www.nyu.edu/its/humanities/ninchguide [13] Odlyzko, A. (1998). The Economics of Electronic Journals, The Journal of Electronic Publishing, Volume 4 , Issue 1, ISSN 1080-2711. http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-01/odlyzko.html [14] OMG Unified Modelling Language Specification (2003), Version 1.5. http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/03-03-01.pdf [15] Open Acces to Scientific and Technical Information: A State of the Art and Future Trends (2003). http://www.inist.fr/openaccess/en/openaccess.php [16] The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting, Protocol Version 2.0, Document Version 2003/02/21. http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html [17] Producer – Archive Interface Methodology Abstract Standard, CCSDS–651.0-W-1, White Book (2001). http://ssdoo.gsfc.nasa.gov/nost/isoas/CCSDS-651.0-W-1.pdf [18] Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS), CCSDS 650.0-B-1, Blue Book (2002). http://wwwclassic.ccsds.org/documents/pdf/CCSDS-650.0-B-1.pdf [19] The State of Digital Preservation: An International Perspective, Conference Proceedings, April 24-25 2002, (2002). http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub107/pub107.pdf [20] Systems Engineering Handbook, INCOSE, Version 2.0 (2002). http://www.incose.com/ [21] Trusted Digital Repositories: Attributes and Responsibilities, An RLG-OCLC Report (2002). http://www.rlg.org/longterm/repositories.pdf Maksimiljan Gerkeš: ELEKTRONSKI ARHIV ZNANSTVENIH IN STROKOVNIH DOKUMENTOV