OZ 2005/1

28 ORGANIZACIJA ZNANJA 2005, LETN. 10, ZV. 1 Today, Inc., 193–204. [39] Robinson, G. (1994). UDC in brief. BSI Standards. [40] Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. JASIS 26, 321–343. [41] Saracevic, T. (1982). Time for divorce: setting up degree pro- grams in information science. Bulletin of the ASIS, June, 32. [42] Saracevic, T. (1992). Information Science: Origin, evolution and relations. V: Vakkari, P. & Cronin, B. (Eds.). Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Historical, Empirical and Theo- retical Perspectives. London: Taylor Graham, 5–27. [43] Saracevic, T. (1995). Informacijske znanosti: Izvor, narava, trendi. Raziskovalec 25. [44] Saracevic, T. and Wood, J. B. (1981). Consolidation of Informati- on: A Handbook on Evaluation, Restructuring and Repackaging of Scientific and Technical Information (Pilot edition). Paris: Unes- co. [45] Schatz, B. R. (2002). The Interspace: Concept Navigation Across Distributed Communities. Computer, January, 54–62. [46] Schrader, A. M. (1984). In search of a name: Information science and its conceptual antecedents. Library and Information Science 6, 227–271. [47] Shannon, C. E. (1948). The Mathematical Theory of Communica- tions. Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423, 623–656. [48] Shapiro, F. R. (1992). Origins of bibliometrics, citation indexing, and citation analysis: The neglected legal literature. JASIS 43, 337–339. [49] Shapiro, F. R. (1995). Coinage of the term information science. JASIS 46, 5, 384–385. [50] Smith, E. S. (1993). On the shoulders of giants: From Boole to Shanon to Taube. The origins and development of computerised information from the mid-19th century to the present. Information Technology and Libraries, 12, 2, 217–226. [51] Šercar, T. (1988). Komunikacijska filozofija znanstvenih časopi- sov. Zagreb: Globus. [52] Šercar, T. M. (1996). Pregled pomembnejših dogodkov v raz- voju informacijske znanosti. Prispevek FID-a. COBISS obv. 1, 3, 12–13. [53] Šercar, T. M. (2000). Toward an assessment of Božo Težak‘s contribution to the development of information science. COBISS obv. 5, 2, 1–14. [54] Šercar, T. M. (2001). Priloga h kritiki tehnološkega determinizma in globalizma. COBISS Obv. 6, 3, 9–49. [55] Šercar, T. M., Oštir, B. (2002). Informacijska sociologija, ekono- mija in informacijska (meta)fizika. Organizacija znanja 7, 1–2, 13–26. [56] Tague-Sutcliffe, J. (Ed.). (1992). Special Issue: Informetrics. Information Processing & Management 28, 1, 1–151. [57] Weinberg, B. H. (1998). The Earliest Hebrew Citation Indexes. V: Buckland, M. and Hahn, T. B. (Eds.). Historical Studies in Infor- mation Science. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 51–63. [58] Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics or Control and Communications in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT. [59] Williams, R. B. (1998). The Documentation and Special Libraries Movements in the United States, 1910–1960. V: Buckland, M. and Hahn, T. B. (Eds.). Historical Studies in Information Science. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 173–179. [60] Wilson, D. A. (1996). Managing knowledge. Oxford: Butter- worth-Heineman. [61] Wilson, T. (2002). “Information Science” and research methods. http://informationr.net/tdw/publ/papers/slovak02.html [62] Woledge, G. (1983). Historical Studies in Documentation. “Bi- bliography” and “Documentation”: Words and Ideas. Journal of Documentation 4, 266–279. [63] Zuboff, Sh. (1988). In the Age of Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books Inc. Tvrtko-Matija Šercar: ALI SLOVENIJA NOČE INFORMACIJSKE ZNANOSTI?